View Single Post
  #5  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2012, 1:45 PM
edsg25 edsg25 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 557
I wonder if anyone in Philly (or who knows Philly well) can answer this question:

It seems to me that if there are two universities that have a lot in common, they would be Temple and Pitt, located in the eastern and western metropolises of Pennsylvania.

Both started as private universities, became public, and now share a private/public position as commonwealth universities along with Penn State.

Yet, unless I'm mistaken, it seems that Pitt is far more part of the fabric of Pittsburgh than Temple is of Philadelphia.

Of course, I realize that Philly is much more of a college town than Pittsburgh and that there is nothing of the quality and power of an ivy League institution like Penn in Pittsburgh (although it would be hard to ignore the status of CMU).

Still, only Pitt and Temple fit that "state related" role in both cities, so comparing them to privates may be irrelevant.


Am I right about my perceptions? Does Pitt get a lot more love from Pittsburgh than Temple does from Philly? And why?
Reply With Quote