Quote:
Originally Posted by haligonia
A little bit excessive, but the point is still valid: urban sprawl as we know it is not an economically or ecologically sustainable form of development.
|
My problem with him is that you can not be against sprawl into the suburbs, and against density in the urban areas. It is one or the other. That is the reason why he comes across as anti-everything. His position overall in untenable, since he doesn't offer viable alternatives. That gives truth then to the argument that really what he is against is developers (read: evil capitalists) as a whole.