Posted Feb 20, 2019, 9:48 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 8,479
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drybrain
I know the city and owner were trying to reach a decision that would preserve them in full. The developer applied for demolition three years ago as of last October, so he can legally demolish them now--but that period ends as of this October, after which he'd have to apply for a new permit, and wait another three years. I haven't heard anything about it, and four months after demolition was permissible both buildings are still occupied, so I guess that's a good sign, thought not definitive.
As for the building across from Flynn Flats, yeah, that would be an atrocious loss. It's pitiful that the conversation district for here has been in a holding pattern for so long.
|
Thanks for that. It sounds encouraging that they are thinking about preserving them. Fingers crossed!
|