Posted Feb 17, 2006, 3:25 PM
|
|
Member of SSP since 1997
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 7,117
|
|
I prefer the lakefront proposal for several reasons - it lends itself to further expansion towards the lake; it's a much less intrusive structure; and the fact that Forest City Enterprises retracted their riverfront proposal and then presented it again makes me question their motives. I should also mention that the new housing/construction in the lower portion of the Tower City/Riverfront proposal (across the river from Terminal Tower) is no longer a component.
|