View Single Post
  #100  
Old Posted May 3, 2012, 8:04 PM
BraveNewWorld's Avatar
BraveNewWorld BraveNewWorld is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 346
Quote:
Originally Posted by marshall View Post
I agree. 1WTC will look just fine when completed, and will stand alone and speak for itself. It will truly be a monolith. I keep saying it over and over, wait until it's finished! It hasn't even topped out yet, the glass isn't on, or the spire. This time next year, people will hopefully appreciate it in all its glory once finished. New York doesn't have to prove anything. Building something like 1WTC the same roof height as the twins is a major accomplishment. Oh and btw, I personally think 1WTC blows the Sears/Willis Tower out of the water in every way. The Sears/Willis Tower is just ugly in my opinion.
Wow, you are biased. Anyone who says the Sears tower is ugly doesn't have an eye for good architecture. On another note, they shouldn't count an antenna's or spires. If I build a 200m building and stick a 400m spire on it, is it 600m ? NO. They should either go by roof height, or top floor height. I would actually say top floor height, because it solves the Chrysler building dilemma.

Also the new WTC is a incredible building, whether it's America's tallest or not. It's a symbol of our freedom, and that America can come back stronger then ever.
Reply With Quote