Posted Nov 12, 2010, 7:26 PM
|
|
¥ ¥ ¥
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 9,916
|
|
I just fail to see the important of some having a building that meets some arbitrary 300 m height and also arbitrarily isn't a building of a certain type or doesn't include spires (unless its "decorative"...also arbitrary). Skyscrapers are cool and all, but this whole "herp derp when we gonna get a supertall?" thing strikes me as some sort of juvenile penis-envy thing. And for all intents and purposes, we already have multiple "supertalls" (FCP & CN Tower, at the very least).
|