[someone123]

The architect's argument about absorption was somewhat contradictory. He started by implying that there's a certain level of absorption or demand and finished by saying that having a larger number of smaller buildings could induce more demand. The UG argument about the specifics of the market is much more convincing and is backed up by the reality of competition between the downtown and suburban housing markets. I would expect demand for downtown housing to be elastic because of suburban construction projects.

I don't think LeRoy was lying when he said HbD is a good document. It has many good parts, like the parts that require buildings to have a proper street-level design. Despite the overwhelming and unfortunate attention that they get, the height limits are only one aspect of HbD.