Article in The Sun today in in which "Owners of the Winnipeg Clinic are fighting a proposed historic designation, which they fear will saddle them with extra work and extra costs."
http://www.winnipegsun.com/2017/10/1...2718b00cf25bb1.
Where do you draw the line as what gets designated as historic? The owners are blaming the nomination to that list for causing a "four-month delay and $20,000 budget increase to a recent one-floor renovation of the building." I sympathize for the owners on this and don't see why this should be designated as historic. Built in 1942, ugly and no real historic value. Not a huge loss if this was ever demolished.
