[citywatch]

It's amenities like this that make me think LA, were I residing in another part of the country, would be a more interesting place to visit or live in. That's why I remain puzzled when many ppl, inc quite a few SSPers, list a city like San Diego instead of LA as one of the places they'd most like to visit or live in.

OK, SD does have a great zoo, a nicely growing DT, Sea World, & other advantages. But as good as it is, it nonetheless does have a second tier depth to it. Therefore, is the superficial appeal of a town more important, or at least as important, as anything else? I'm starting to think so.