[LeadingEdgeBoomer]

read it quickly.

It was written by Justice Susan Lang and endorsed by the two others on the panel. A 3-0 decision.

FOL challenged Justice Hackland's decision on three points where it said he erred in Law.

The Appeal's Court dissected Hackland's decison on each of the three points and strongly upheld all of his rulings. Basically they did not disagree one iota on even the smallest point of how Hackland arrived at his decision.

As Rick Chiarelli said earlier today---The LPP has now been approved by City Council, the OMB, the Superior Court of Ont. and the Appeals Court of Ont.

The judgements have been so strong that I doubt that the Supreme Court would even hear the case let alone overturn the previous judgements. Therefor , I do not think that the City would be incurring much risk in going ahead now with construction, even if FOL does try to appeal to the SC.

I trust that FOL realizes that they will meet a lot of scorn and derision from the public if they try to delay the LPP any longer.