Posted May 6, 2014, 6:37 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 12,634
|
|
Ahh gotcha, took a look at the report, looks like they booked a lot of the negative absorption in FY 2013. CBRE only showed a couple hundred thousand sq ft of negative absorption in 2013 while Coliers showed -885,000, so it is a timing issue that explains the discrepancy.
Like I said, a lot of credible firms that have differing analytically techniques can make this a tricky business.
|