View Single Post
  #33  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2010, 12:24 PM
phrenic phrenic is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 412
Quote:
Originally Posted by fenwick16 View Post
I can't say that I have too much sympathy. Although I appreciate wildlife, just because wildlife decides to build their habitats within a urban setting should we all move elsewhere?
Umm, pretty sure 'wildlife' was there before it ever was an urban area.

Quote:
Originally Posted by fenwick16 View Post
I guess what strikes me is that the person that made this video wants others to give up their plans, but is he willing to convert his own home into parkland? His own home was at one time a habitat for wildlife. Did he make a video showing how his own home has impacted wildlife?
Not at all the point and a ridiculous way to throw it back at him. He's basically saying that there is more shoreline and wildlife there than the developer and/or Department of Environment have acknowledged - which appears to be absolutely true.

It's a shame this is being lost, but overall the development is for the greater good. However maybe there is a need for better environmental impact studies when it comes to infill projects.
Reply With Quote