View Single Post
  #5363  
Old Posted Dec 20, 2018, 5:42 AM
ealba ealba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 39
What this doesn’t take into account (and the article acknowledges this, but not enough, in my opinion, to keep from being misleading) is that because of natural growth, the populations of Los Angeles, New York City, and Chicago are growing, despite any net negative migration metric applied.

2. Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, California

Population decrease due to migration, 2010-2017: -93,959
Population change, 2010-2017: +4.1 percent (12,828,961 to 13,353,907)
Natural growth, 2010-2017: 1,202,115 births, 578,750 deaths
Median home value: $578,200

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money...tion/35801453/
Reply With Quote