View Single Post
  #42  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2008, 12:25 AM
innov8's Avatar
innov8 innov8 is offline
Kodachrome
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: livinginurbansac.blogspot
Posts: 5,079
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianSac View Post
The state=Large floor plates: why?
Taylor<30 stories: the reason behind this?
Back when the West End Office Complex was going through the public
meeting process there was a point when the Department of General Services
and Real Estate Services Division, (in charge of planning and permitting)
explained that a couple of the proposals that were shown could not be built
because the floor plates weren’t large enough. They said a state law had
been passed years ago detailing how new state office buildings had to be
built to a certain square footage per floor. This ruled out the Slender Tower
alternatives that many people choose as their favorite. It’s odd that they
even offered it as a choice?

I think the reason Taylor will never build over 30 floors is because there is
not enough need for it. At one time 621CM was proposed at 31 floors, but for
6 years Taylor could not find enough tenants to fill it so banks could
loan him the money to build. A certain percentage of square feet in a
tower has to be leased out before money is released to build. Unless a
tower is built on speculation (like 500cm) it becomes difficult in Sacramento
to build anything over 400,000sf.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Pistola916 View Post
The Metropolitan would be next in line at 39-40 stories, but thats still a few years away from construction.
The Metropolitan might be 40 floors but it will still be shorter than Wells Fargo
or the same height when done. Residential floors are shorter than office floors.
Reply With Quote