Posted Jan 25, 2017, 11:26 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 669
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Groundhog
Especially in a city like Philadelphia, where there is lots of real history, I think there needs to be a separate classification that is less stringent and easier to set up than the "historic" classification. Historic classification should require something to be completely saved, while a lesser designation, say, "archetype architecture" would require some restoration/elements of a building to remain in place, but would generally allow for significant alterations to a property with fewer (although still some) hoops to jump through for developers.
|
This is an excellent point
|