Quote:
Originally Posted by Emprise du Lion
Source: Loopnet.com
the fact that the building is dated
|
What's weird though is that, despite being 36 years old now, it's still one of the youngest office towers in downtown st. Louis.
And when it became vacant 10 years ago, it was only 26 years old; it wasn't some decrepit century-old dinosaur that needed $100M+ to modernize ancient building systems.
Just about all of st. louis' significant urban office buildings constructed over the past three decades have been built out in Clayton.
I often wonder about how much healthier downtown st. Louis might be today if downtown Clayton had never become a thing.
my guess is that this building would've almost certainly not sat vacant for so long if there was no Clayton.