Quote:
Originally Posted by Capsicum
W
Interesting that LA has lots of Far Eastern people (Chinese, Japanese, Koreans etc.) and Middle Eastern people (eg. Persians, Arabs, Armenians etc.), but not many people from the Indian subcontinent (Indians, Pakistanis, Bangladeshis etc.), which is in between the Far East and Middle East.
|
LA has a ton of Far Eastern + Persian + Armenian, but lacks all the mountainous Central Asian countries, for the most part. I don't think they have a lot from the -stan countries, the old Silk Road locales.
NYC has visible Uzbecki, Tajik (mostly Bukharan), Ugihur (technically China but really Turk), Georgian, Nepalese and Tibetan communities.
But I still think Vancouver is the obvious answer. It may lack Asian diversity but the comparable % is massive. And Han Chinese are the ascendant dominant culture in the city, analagous to Cubans in Miami 20 years ago. NYC and LA will probably never be Asian-dominated cities like Vancouver.