View Single Post
  #91  
Old Posted May 3, 2012, 3:24 AM
chris123678's Avatar
chris123678 chris123678 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Philadelphia, Pa
Posts: 473
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadcruiser1 View Post
No it will not. The spire contains the antenna so you are wrong. The difference between an antenna and a spire is an antenna can be removed. It is not attached to the structure in any way or form. The spire on One World Trade Center is connected to the structure of the building. It is technically part of the building. You guys are falling into Chicago's trick here. Chicago wants to keep their title and if you keep saying this you are letting them win.
But In the Case Of One World Trade Center wouldn't the spire be placed on just like an antenna? The only difference i see, and i could very well be wrong is that the cone encase the antenna.
I don' care about The Title, I'm just trying to make sense of it all. It's attached just like an antenna. Once the roof is completed, they are attaching a spire on. Just like the Bank Of america tower, they are really antenna's if you ask me
Reply With Quote