Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire
The examples you mentioned are because those things (human rights, handicapped accessibility) are regulated by government. To my knowledge, the language that companies conduct their business in is not. And for good reason... regulating it would be meddling for no legitimate public purpose (unlike equality and accessibility).
So if there are no such requirements, how can a business be faulted for making a perfectly legitimate choice that it is entitled to make?
|
Some people still see all of that stuff as unwarranted nanny state-ism. As I said, it's just a question of opinion as to what is acceptable control and what isn't.