According to a Dreschel editorial I read this morning, it did actually... but I can't seem to find it on the spec site now. It was an editorial on how the rule on vacation payouts has been bent in the last few years as it is supposed to be paid out only in circumstances where the vacation has been missed due to sickness or absence, not workload as was Chapman's case. Apparently this is only now coming to council's attention.
__________________
"Above all, Hamilton must learn to think like a city, not a suburban hybrid where residents drive everywhere. What makes Hamilton interesting is the fact it's a city. The sprawl that surrounds it, which can be found all over North America, is running out of time."
|