Quote:
Originally Posted by markbarbera
Last November, Council asked for an explanation on the legality of Chapman's $30,000 raise, and they were told it was legal. In March they have directed staff for an explanation of the pay in lieu of vacation time (allegedly - if the request is made in camera it is not supposed to be discussed publicly), and there is absolutely no reason to believe the outcome will be any different.
|
As I had predicted, staff reported back this week that the $8000 paid to Peggy Chapman in lieu of vacation time did not violate the city's vacation entitlement policies.