Quote:
Originally Posted by lawfin
I wonder if you could do Chicago lakefront...especially its North lake front from Loop to Rogers Park.
I am surprised the NYC is as high as it is weighted; most of the other cities fall a little above or below roughly double their std density. NYC is 2.5 or so
|
Can you draw the area you want to include? Mostly so that I know how far West you want me to go.
http://www.citypopulation.de/php/usa-chicago.php
Quote:
Originally Posted by dave8721
I did Miami and it came out pretty unusual compared to all the others. It has much more of a flat density rather than huge peaks and valleys. For example only 32% of the population lived at densities above 15,000 ppsm but 73% lived above 10,000. The weighted density came out to about 12,450 ppsm which is almost exactly the actual density (simple population / area). I guess this means the density curve was rather flat with a ton of people living at around 12,000 ppsm but fewer living in densities higher or lower.
**I would have loved to have seen Miami's numbers in 2012 or even 2011 as opposed to 2010. There was a huge increase in the ultra high densities in just a years time after the census was taken (downtown condo's filled up).
|
So that was Miami proper for 2010, not including Miami Beach and what not? And is 12,450 ppsm rounded or exact? Mississauga's weighted density is much higher than the gross/standard density, even though most people live at around the same densities (except a few condos in the central part), however, Mississauga includes a huge amount of land around the airport where no-one lives.