Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire
Yeah, I saw that blurb about the arch allowing one pier to be eliminated, but in terms of cost-benefit how much does that really mean?
|
Exactly. Kinda like wasteong $13 million on making a crosswalk at P&M. Or using stucco on the Alt over stone. Or pull the louvred off that TNS. ( sarcasm intended )
This city is so known for making ugly bridges. Go anywhere else and they make pleasing bridges. So I’m ALL for making this one stand out. Rather then making just another concrete ugly pos.