Posted Jul 28, 2015, 3:05 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,250
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Festivus
I agree, but with the exception of a place like Los Angeles where you wouldn't need any new buildings really. The biggest flaw in the Olympics (besides the massive corruption and kickback schemes) is that they insist on having new places built, even if existing venues are satisfactory.
Really they should have like 2 or 3 cities that just rotate it.
|
I think they just changed that policy:
Quote:
|
The IOC to actively promote the maximum use of existing facilities and the use of temporary and demountable venues.
|
|