View Single Post
  #89  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2016, 1:22 PM
TimeFadesAway TimeFadesAway is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 722
Quote:
Originally Posted by trueviking View Post
The cynical side of me wonders about the timing of this. That pad was used as a shiny bauble to convince the city to agree to close the intersection for 40 years. 37 years later, the agreement is coming up for renewal. Is this the second verse, same as the first?
Do they actually need to convince anyone? My understanding is that they can just say no and that's it, it stays closed.
Reply With Quote