Quote:
Originally Posted by matt602
It should be rescinded as it never should have been raised in the first place unless some solid evidence and numbers can be provided as to why she is deserving of the raise, instead of "she should have had it to begin with, it was a correction". Why should a chief of staff at the municipal level be making over $100k a year when we're consistently facing budget cuts and belt tightening? Why are we getting lied to and made to feel that these problems are our misunderstandings? The mayor and city employees work for us and are accountable to us, if there's any misunderstanding it is theirs to have. Any negative inference here is purely intentional.
|
never mind that the person getting the raise is the same person who should be preventing Bob from making all these mistakes. That's the really delicious part of this little fray,