View Single Post
  #2342  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2018, 2:15 AM
jawagord's Avatar
jawagord jawagord is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,703
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corndogger View Post
My points have nothing to do with the cost of the machine but with how much such a machine can save us. It sounds like a lot which would make spending $120 million or so a no-brainer. What other projects could such a machine be used on? Could we rent it out to other cities when we're not using it?
I wouldn't expect the TBM will be re-usable if it's built to dig one large tunnel, so it's a moot point on who buys it. It doesn't take much reading between the lines to see the tunnelling costs are going way over budget, hence the scramble to find the cheapest way to do it, but there really is no cheap way to tunnel through downtown. So watch for a request to increase the budget (hello city taxpayers if 6 billion is the number) or say goodbye to a couple of stations in a round of cost cutting.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nat...f55fe79b03d9d7

https://www.wired.com/2017/04/4-year...inally-breaks/
__________________
The human ability to innovate out of a jam is profound. That's why Darwin will always be right and Malthus will always be wrong - K.R.Sridhar

‘I believe in science’ is a statement generally made by people who don’t understand much about it. - Judith Curry, Professor Emeritus GIT
Reply With Quote