View Single Post
  #83  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2011, 10:39 PM
Requin Requin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 97
Quote:
Originally Posted by DubberDom View Post
Although I believe that the expansion of the 174 between Trim and 417 is warranted, the city should opposed any expansion of the 174 east of Trim. The sole purpose of this expansion will be to service growth in Rockland and other communities east of Ottawa, while bringing no benefit to the city of Ottawa except more traffic, at the expense of further destroying the watershed along the river where the highway will expand.
Completely agree with this as well. If the expansion east of Trim goes ahead, Rockland should pay for it. There are only negative implications for Ottawa. It's quite infuriating, actually.
Reply With Quote