View Single Post
  #52  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2012, 7:54 PM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,952
Again, the funding model for our office towers has zero bearing on the architecture, so whether it's Teachers or BCIMC is moot. Also strange is the need to defend the city's architecture as a whole when our superior condo architecture is already acknowledged, and the subject is office towers?

And if you accuse someone of cherrypicking, at least do your homework and show what else has been so greviously omitted. Is 100 Adelaide - a proposal of a box with chipped corners - that big a gamechanger that it will have invalidated such an overwhelmingly obvious general pattern?
Reply With Quote