View Single Post
  #77  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2019, 1:47 PM
OldDartmouthMark OldDartmouthMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 8,482
Thanks. That makes sense.

As a government entity, I suppose they want to make sure that they do their due diligence to prevent public backlash if land is sold to a developer who builds something that's not popular. By going through this process first, they can at least say that the public was engaged in the process.

That said, it does seem a little wasteful, but unfortunately that's government (and politics in general).
Reply With Quote