View Single Post
  #10  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2016, 12:34 AM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is offline
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 34,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beedok View Post
Visit Ottawa. The whole city CBD is filler.

There can be good quality filler or bad quality filler, but whatever the quality it's not a landmark. It just sort of blends in. Basically to me filler is a building with a conservative design ethos.

Landmarks can be good or bad too though, and an ugly landmark is worse than ugly filler.
Agreed.

The Rooms = Ugly landmark.

An ugly filler probably doesn't even have a widely-known name.

Filler is just average for that city. It does no harm, often has excellent street interaction, but it's just unremarkable in design. It's urban background noise. It's the Civic on the highway. Contributes to the overall feel the way infill does, but nothing more.

It's definitely a positive, unless it occupies a place that would've been perfect for a landmark building. But it's better than a parking lot or a break in urbanity.
__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."