View Single Post
  #30  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2017, 7:37 AM
CaliNative CaliNative is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 3,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedestrian View Post
San Francisco DOES allow taller buildings on its hills although Nob and Russian Hills have been pretty well built out for decades (You will note there are several prominent residential towers on both hills from the 1950s/60s). The new development on Rincon Hill, however, is the premier example of this policy and building on Cathedral Hill is another example.

This is principle #2 of the city's Urban Design Plan:
Yes, Russian & Nob Hills do have some 20-30 story buildings (Mark Hopkins, Fairmont etc.). Rincon "Hill" isn't much of a hill, is it? Then there is that enormous T.V. tower on top of the high hill near Twin Peaks. Or is it Mt. Davidson?

Last edited by CaliNative; Jun 26, 2017 at 7:50 AM.
Reply With Quote