Quote:
Originally Posted by BTinSF
...I'll go out of a limb and predict that, since it's the ugliest and least imaginative, #4 is what will get picked by any right-thinking San Francisco commission or board of "deciders"...
|
Yeah, or the one that works out the best financially. I hope it's not Federal Development.
Judging from the renderings, I like Build Inc. and Giants so far. Notice how the Giants scheme has their tower away from seeing the ballpark's infield? Kenwood Investments' scheme looks the most 'San Francisco' to me, being a little more conservative. Does anyone here like Federal Development's scheme? I don't.