Quote:
Originally Posted by LeadingEdgeBoomer
.
I assume that costs are not asked for because FOL filed this case before the court when the City still had that foolish law in place stating that they would not seek costs.
On the other hand John martin filed his case after the city reversed this law , so the city is seeking some costs from him.
|
That policy was repealed before the appeal was launched. There wouldn't be any reason not to seek costs on appeal, but you could be right and that's why they didn't ask.