Quote:
Originally Posted by greenmidtown
22nd st. is blocked at Q. 17th street is beat up in a lot of spots with no visible bike lane. None give bikers the convenience of riding north-south through a few traffic signals instead of a stop sign at every intersection. Cars have 9th street, 10th st., 16th street, 19th street, 21st street, all as three-lane freeways cutting through the downtown core. If 19th st. and 21st. were converted to two-lane freeways they would still have 9th, 10th, and 16th st. three-lane freeways. You're saying having 3 three-lane freeways and 2 two-lane freeways just for the less-traveled north-south route is too burdensome to drivers? And essentially bikers, most of whom live here unlike the drivers, can remain inconvenienced by the current set-up?
|
Funny... you call them freeways
From my experiences of riding on the
downtown/midtown roads, they aren't freeways. The lights are timed so if
you want to go down 21st Street and not stop at every light, you cruse
a 30 mph. Some idiots don't seem to get that.
greenmidtown, this is my opinion. I spend a ton of time all over the grid either
working, living or taking lots of pictures that I share on the this forum.
However it works out, I bet in 20 years a new generation of Sacramentans
will think they know better and change it all over again.