View Single Post
  #220  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2014, 2:30 AM
Jelly Roll Jelly Roll is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,314
Quote:
Originally Posted by shipsterns View Post
Regarding Iwill's critiques and the subsequent discussion of CITC's placement in the skyline:

I think it's perfect where it is. Yes, some of the world's most recognizable skylines have the bimodal shape, but it don't think it's a necessary criterion for being recognizable. If anything, NYC and Chicago are exceptions -- because they're so massive, they can get away without the wedding cake shape. Look at Atlanta for instance -- from afar, it looks like a sprawling, loosely connected string of cities rather than a single, unified urban center:


(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Fr...wn2Buckead.jpg)

Philly, on the other hand, has the classic wedding cake shape, and it pulls it off incredibly well. Combine that with an abundance of midrises (you can thank the gentleman's agreement for that) and you have a really neat, dense, and world-class skyline. I mean look at Shanghai for God's sake! No one would say, "hm...let's put the Shanghai Tower further from the central business district." Why do the same for Philadelphia?
The city needs to add more subway lines if it wants to create another big office CBD.
__________________
"Jesus would still be alive today if he had a gun." -Homer Simpson
Reply With Quote