View Single Post
  #11354  
Old Posted May 14, 2018, 6:57 PM
wong21fr's Avatar
wong21fr wong21fr is online now
Reluctant Hobbesian
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 13,162
Quote:
Originally Posted by TakeFive View Post
While coverage is not unimportant it can limit RTD's ability to invest in a more a competitive product/routes which would produce much better ridership numbers.
This is the primary issue with RTD. Its mission is to provide transportation coverage over a large geographic area with the logical result being multiple routes that have meandering paths with low frequency and lousy ridership. Doing otherwise invites the wrath of local municipalities that would feel cheated if there service was reduced from a trunk line to a ride-sharing option performance be damned. The regional nature of RTD is killing the local routes.

Could RTD's mission be changed to provide transit access where multiple routes would be cut while others, mostly in Denver, would be greatly expanded? Is the political will there? Probably not.
__________________
"You don't strike, you just go to work everyday and do your job real half-ass. That's the American way!" -Homer Simpson

All of us who are concerned for peace and triumph of reason and justice must be keenly aware how small an influence reason and honest good will exert upon events in the political field. ~Albert Einstein

Reply With Quote