View Single Post
  #1954  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2017, 10:26 PM
CrossedTheTracks CrossedTheTracks is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 354
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgarian View Post
Someone was telling me they heard on the radio that some critic of the Green Line was saying this would be one of, if not the most expensive $/km transit project on the planet, anyone hear anything to this effect? Seems like political posturing to me as there are a ton of ways to measure things like this, and Calgary is small time compared to most of the rest of the world.
It's incorrect on the face of it. For example, the Spadina line extension in Toronto is costing US$ 462 million per mile (using numbers from https://www.thetransportpolitic.com/transitexplorer/). Meanwhile, phase 1 of Green Line is C$ 368 million per mile, assuming C$4.6 billion for 20 km. (Sorry for the mixed currencies and units, just working with the data I've got.)

Or how about New York's 2nd Ave subway line, at US$2,400 million per mile?

I don't mean to say that we ought to directly compare Green Line to the Spadina extension or 2nd Ave subway. But anyone claiming/whining that Green Line is "too expensive" needs to find a similar mixed-tunneled/surface/elevated project in North America or western Europe to make any kind of comparison.

If the complainer wishes to say "it's too fancy because of the tunneling, we shouldn't do that, shouldn't spend money on it", ok, go for it. Then explain how it will impact surface traffic even more than current plans.
__________________
"Skyscraper, skyscraper, scrape me some sky..." - Dennis Lee
Reply With Quote