Quote:
Originally Posted by freeweed
I'm assuming these 2 statements were not intended to be quite as related as I'm reading them, but if so... mind explaining?
Is ultra-sprawl-worthy development somehow justified so long as the residents are "ultra rich"?  |
Mount Royal has been an enclave of estates since it's inception. Many of the other urban areas that are seeing infill have always been for "normal" people, it's just now land values and proximity are dictating what types of housing those "normal" people live in.
(Insert obligatory, SSP-mandated, "the rich are evil" statement)