The Milam tower elevation is nice and sleek, but the 3-D rendering is outright beautiful. It has such a nice organic flow. A much better case of great architecture.
I had serious doubts before, especially since the county planning has so far said no way to the height, but the renderings are very persuasive and the FAA might just be generous.
LET IT BE!!!
Seeing the (rough) height comparisons Milam doesn't look at all out of place. With the wide base (and again) the organic flow to the top ( not a pinnacle)
the building would be a fine addition. And they don't show the Fontainbleau with it's height of 750 feet, right next door.
Oh yeah, no ones mentioned the article quote about Allure tower 2 going to be "substantially taller".