View Single Post
  #873  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2012, 2:53 AM
Ch.G, Ch.G's Avatar
Ch.G, Ch.G Ch.G, Ch.G is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
Democrats bungled it. They could have sold higher-speed rail as a low-cost, responsible, modest way to upgrade our transportation network during a tough economy. That would have given ammo to the opponents of the California project, but it would have helped build a national consensus for rail that might eventually float all boats.

Instead, Obama lumped all rail investments into the HSR category, which really doesn't help anybody distinguish between the crazy-expensive 220mph systems and the modest 110mph systems. Ohio's planned line didn't even meet that standard, with a 79mph top speed and an average speed so low that could be equaled on horseback.

Democrats just don't understand modesty, do they?
I vehemently disagree. GOP/Tea Party opposition to spending knows no bounds, and certainly isn't influenced by messaging.

And you realize Ray LaHood is a Republican, right?
Reply With Quote