Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta3000
For those in favor of covering the Connector, what exacting are you expecting with the additional land? Park-space?...Piedmont Park is one of the largest urban parks in the country. More developable land?...do we not already have an abundance of surface lots that need to be developed?
|
Personally I enjoy the view, as well, and don't want them to chase this instead of other projects with more bang for the buck. But the connector is an open wound that severely damages Atlanta's pedestrian appeal, making destinations seem further apart and limiting the creation of appealing spaces.
When Boston did the Big Dig the bulk of new land recovered was given over to simple greenspace, but this improved the value and appeal of the adjoining development and now it's a destination contributing to the city's tourist appeal. Imagine if Atlanta had some nearly 1 mile long park running through midtown and Georgia Tech? Put some new attractions and commercial or residential activity adjacent to that and it would be an instant hit. It could help relieve pressure on Piedmont Park and encourage more outdoor activity among residents. And imagine the views of the skyline from that park setting, as opposed to simply whipping by in the car.
Yes it's far fetched, but great cities have an abundance of great spaces. Any city would love more, but Atlanta especially is lacking. We're 2/3 the size of Chicago but have, what, 1/5th the greenspace?! Covering the interstate would create a great space, without dislocating existing structures or residents.