Quote:
Originally Posted by JDRCRASH
What the hell are you talking about? How would increasing California's rainfall hurt the Midwest's and Southeast's?
|
It's quite simple really. There's a certain amount of moisture in the atmosphere. If it falls on California instead of continuing the move east across the North American continent, then some other place is deprived of rain it would otherwise have gotten. It's just like building a dam upstream and diverting water from a river - there will be less water that gets to the places downstream. And in the case of atmospheric moisture and clouds, we know even less about how it works and what we would likely screw up.
In other words, cloud-seeding will never be used to any meaningful degree for political if not technological reasons.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDRCRASH
Why not? It's happening in other countries.
|
It is being used in very limited ways over very small areas.
China used it to keep rain away from Beijing's Olympic venues during the games, ski resorts use it to induce blizzards (over an area of a few square miles) when they haven't gotten enough snow to open for the season, sometimes it is used to prevent particularly severe weather (if such weather is predicted in time). None of those examples are remotely like solving California's water problem by increasing annual rainfall.
edit: read your link and apparently they're doing larger scale operations in Australia and in a couple of African countries. But then, there's nothing but thousands of miles of ocean to the east of Tasmania (so no harm done really), and Mali and Niger probably aren't winning any accolades from their neighbors. Perhaps if North Carolina experienced a massive drought, they would be allowed to try cloud seeding. California is on the wrong end of the continent.