HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted: May 5, 2007, 5:03 PM
ssiguy ssiguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,372
Nucleur power plants need access to large water lakes so I don't know how Ed/Cal could be considered.

I think nucleur is a great idea. Ya expensive for capital costs but if it helps clean up the atmoshere then count me in. It is a very safe technology.

Wind and solar power may make us feel all cozy inside but they are not options. Anyone who think Alberta can live on these technologies needs a therapist. Nucleur will only increase in its use worldwide and to me that's a really good thing. Ya, coal is much cleaner than it use to be but its still an emitter of green-house gases. Its yesterdays technology.
I rather live a km from a nucleur plant than a coal plant anyday of the week. Infact I would NEVER live within a km of a coal plant...........I value my ability to breath air.
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:15 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.