HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Highrise & Supertall Proposals

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted: Sep 4, 2007, 3:40 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 34,779
The Edmontonian - 41 - 136m -NEW TALLEST CONDO

Will be the nicest tower in the city IMO and only 10m from the tallest in the city.



Identification
Official name The Edmontonian
Emporis Building Number 307088

Location
Address *
City Edmonton
State Alberta
Country Canada

Technical Data
Height (struct.) 136 m 447 ft
Floors (OG) 41


Building in General
Type of construction high-rise building
Main usages
*
Status proposed
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted: Sep 4, 2007, 3:41 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 34,779
oh and yes...this is in EDMONTON.

dont like the name
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted: Sep 4, 2007, 4:36 AM
Dale Dale is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Orlando
Posts: 3,055
I like it. Too bad they couldn't just add another 11m though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted: Sep 4, 2007, 5:21 AM
mersar's Avatar
mersar mersar is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 9,271
Agreed, unfortunately due to the downtown airport this is pushing the maximum allowed height.

But very nice design, very suitable for its size.
__________________

Live or work in the Beltline? Check out the Official Beltline web site here
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted: Sep 4, 2007, 11:14 AM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 3,946
I like the design accept for the base, it doesn't suit the rest of the tower IMO. It could also do without that roof overhang.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted: Sep 4, 2007, 3:25 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 34,779
^the base is suitable and works well IMO...it is on a major street which should have commercial main floor.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted: Sep 4, 2007, 4:59 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
The Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Liver & Onions
Posts: 18,559
great proposal, but drop the unoriginal name.
__________________
There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know. -Donald Rumsfeld
Didn't you notice on the plane when you started talking, eventually I started reading the vomit bag?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted: Sep 4, 2007, 6:46 PM
Xelebes's Avatar
Xelebes Xelebes is offline
Whitehall Shadowdweller
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Rockin' in Edmonton
Posts: 8,643
Quote:
Originally Posted by MolsonExport View Post
great proposal, but drop the unoriginal name.
And what? Call it Fusion? Matrix? The Grosvenor?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted: Sep 4, 2007, 7:17 PM
davee930's Avatar
davee930 davee930 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: calgary
Posts: 647
I think this is a very nide building, but it would look so much better without the roof piece with the trailer awning attached to it
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted: Sep 5, 2007, 11:57 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: AUSTIN
Posts: 33,246
I like it. I do like the hangover on the roof. One note though, I think the hangover would look better if it were equally as long as the part to the left. Have the hangover go all the way to the edge of the facade instead of cutting off before the edge. Either that or remove it completely.
__________________
Facebook
I like the Raleighs
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted: Sep 5, 2007, 1:03 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
The Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Liver & Onions
Posts: 18,559
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xelebes View Post
And what? Call it Fusion? Matrix? The Grosvenor?
How about the Tarsands Tower?
__________________
There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know. -Donald Rumsfeld
Didn't you notice on the plane when you started talking, eventually I started reading the vomit bag?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted: Sep 14, 2007, 4:14 PM
ExcaliburKid's Avatar
ExcaliburKid ExcaliburKid is offline
Derp
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,587
Quote:
Condo tower could be first of many
Proposed 41-storey project surrounded by vacant land being eyed by developers
Ron Chalmers, The Edmonton Journal
Published: 2:39 am
EDMONTON - BCM Developments is planning a 41-storey condominium tower at 101st Street and 105A Avenue -- extending the downtown's northward expansion.

The proposed site, a gravel parking lot on the east side of 101st Street, now is surrounded by vacant land, under-used retail space and men's shelters.

But the area could be transformed by the Aurora condo project to the west, where construction will start soon, by the Station Lands mixed-use project to the south, which remains unscheduled, and possibly by a new hockey arena to the south, now being considered by a mayor's committee.

It's a good area close to the downtown, and I think you'll see more towers going up," Max Raimondi, BCM's development manager, said Thursday.

The building, tentatively called The Edmontonian, would have three levels of underground parking and a six-level above-ground parking podium with ground-level commercial space -- topped by a narrower tower with 35 to 38 storeys of condos.

Project architect Terry Hartwig already has met with the Edmonton design committee, which, he said, persuaded him that the parking podium, above ground level, should be "wrapped" with condos on the outer edges "to soften the look of the towers, and put more eyes on the street."

The roof of the six-storey podium would provide outdoor "amenity space for residents," he said.

"On about the 30th floor we would have a sky garden, two or three storeys high, with a great view of the city and the river valley," Hartwig said.

The building would be finished with greenish-blue glass and stucco detailing. It could include geothermal heating and a gas-burning electrical generator that would power the building and supply electricity to the grid.

It will be lower than Manulife Place, only slightly taller than the CN Tower, and would not obstruct City Centre Airport flights, Raimondi said.

Still, the height could be a concern as it relates to density, with about 220 units planned on an 1,800-square-metre site.

"I think density will be the one issue," Hartwig said. He hopes the building will be seen as an asset to the community, with "an elegant, beautiful tower" and ground-level amenities such as a coffee shop to increase pedestrian activity.

BCM has not formally announced its Edmontonian condo plan but some details have appeared on a website, www.connect2edmonton.ca -- an online forum sponsored by the Edmonton Economic Development Corporation and other agencies.

Connect2Edmonton has reported that The Edmontonian currently is its second most-frequent discussion topic. Recently posted comments questioned the building's proximity to the airport flight path, debated above-ground parking and praised the tower design.

BCM is preparing to present the plan to a community meeting before asking city council for a re-zoning.

Raimondi expects construction to start in about two years, subject to pre-sales.

BCM's other activities include The Zen condominium, with 86 units, under construction at 114th Street and 105th Avenue, The Max, a 93-unit condo development with construction soon to start at 113th Street and 105th Avenue, and the 81-unit Fuzion condo development, proposed for Whyte Avenue and 102nd Street.

rchalmers@thejournal.canwest.com

© The Edmonton Journal 2007
A related story regarding this project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Highrise & Supertall Proposals
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:02 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.