HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > SSP: Local Portland > Downtown & City of Portland

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #38  
Old Posted: Sep 7, 2009, 7:29 PM
Leo Leo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by JordanL View Post
This is why I flat refuse to live in anything but an actual house, urban living be damned.

I'm not giving control of my property to an HOA, period.
Actually, you have exactly the same vulnerability if you buy an "actual house" with an HOA. This has nothing to do with condo vs. single-family residence. Even in a development of SFR's, the developer holds the voting rights for the unsold houses.

The only upside of an HOA comes if you need to take the developer to court for construction defects; then you can split the legal costs among the HOA. If you're going up against the developer on your own, he can tie you up in court until you run out of money.
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > SSP: Local Portland > Downtown & City of Portland
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:09 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.