Skyscraper posters - sale!  
HomeDiagramsCitiesForumSkyscraper PostersStore
     
--> Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web. The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics. SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

You are currently browsing as a guest. Register with the SkyscraperPage Forum and join this growing community of skyscraper enthusiasts. Registering has benefits such as fewer ad banners, the ability to post messages, private messaging and more.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Projects & Construction > Highrise Construction

Epcor Tower in the SkyscraperPage Database
  Status: under-construction    Completion: 2011

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Edmonton Skyscraper Diagram

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #61  
Old 09-30-2009, 01:10 AM
TOBoy TOBoy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 713

If this was originally proposed at 34 floor and 490 ft. why now at 29 floors is it still 490 ft.? It doesn't look that tall in the rendering.


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #62  
Old 09-30-2009, 02:34 AM
Phil McAvity's Avatar
Phil McAvity Phil McAvity is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 993

Quote:
Originally Posted by onishenko View Post
14 foot floors = less floors, but more height. A specific design choice. And yes, we updated the wiki page to align with the newly confirmed height.
Neither your math nor your explanation makes sense. 14 feet per floor is pretty common in office buildings and that would make Epcor 406 feet tall not 490. I'm almost positive that 490 feet is wrong.


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #63  
Old 09-30-2009, 02:55 AM
onishenko's Avatar
onishenko onishenko is online now
Urban Advocate
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edmonton/Waterloo
Posts: 4,036

Nope. confirmation from the builder specifically. The new height is in fact 490ft to the tip of the extension on the tower.


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #64  
Old 10-06-2009, 04:53 PM
bulliver's Avatar
bulliver bulliver is offline
So very tired...
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 790

Yesterday:





Reply With Quote
     
     
  #65  
Old 10-06-2009, 06:35 PM
plinko's Avatar
plinko plinko is offline
Bad Kitty
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: in your pool cabana
Posts: 4,780

This is my first time looking that this thread. The redesign is unfortunate, I much preferred the original. Nonetheless, nice to see Edmonton getting a new tallest.


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #66  
Old 10-06-2009, 06:43 PM
isaidso isaidso is offline
The New Republic
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United Provinces of America
Posts: 397

Quote:
Originally Posted by onishenko View Post
New rendering with some exterior design changes:

Oh no! What happened to the original design? This is generic, suburban and a big disappointment ..... Edmonton, you can do better than that, I almost fell asleep looking at it.


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #67  
Old 10-06-2009, 08:29 PM
Govertical's Avatar
Govertical Govertical is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 56

It might as well be a big condo now!


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #68  
Old 10-16-2009, 03:32 AM
bicycles bicycles is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 53

a view from behind the hoarding. courtesy of cdnklc





Reply With Quote
     
     
  #69  
Old 10-26-2009, 08:09 PM
bulliver's Avatar
bulliver bulliver is offline
So very tired...
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 790

From yesterday....








Reply With Quote
     
     
  #70  
Old 10-26-2009, 09:36 PM
brenGT2 brenGT2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2

I believe that I should start contributing to this and other Edmonton threads. I drive by both EPCOR tower and the Icon, as well as Quest Condos, which I don't believe is even being covered here, and it's nearly done. I may be able to add pictures relatively often.


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #71  
Old 10-26-2009, 09:53 PM
bulliver's Avatar
bulliver bulliver is offline
So very tired...
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 790

^ Yes, you should!

Yeah, Icon and Quest aren't really important enough to warrant their own thread here. Usually we just dump pics into the general Edmonton construction thread.


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #72  
Old 10-27-2009, 07:54 PM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,279

Quote:
Originally Posted by isaidso View Post
Oh no! What happened to the original design? This is generic, suburban and a big disappointment ..... Edmonton, you can do better than that, I almost fell asleep looking at it.
I actually prefer the new design as it appears to have slimmed it down a bit - each to their own I guess.
(I still can't see how it's taller than Manulife but time will tell).


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #73  
Old 10-31-2009, 04:25 AM
bigcitydude bigcitydude is offline
CEO
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 57

i love it's look! and the fact that it's sideways? what this city needs is a tower at least 50 stories! that would be sweet!


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #74  
Old 11-03-2009, 02:45 AM
bulliver's Avatar
bulliver bulliver is offline
So very tired...
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 790

Roughly a third of the way to topping out:


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #75  
Old 11-06-2009, 10:50 PM
wco's Avatar
wco wco is offline
Business Is Usual
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Formerly Edmonton
Posts: 257
EPCOR Tower - Edmonton


A couple more of something we've been waiting for...






My usual view has changed dramatically....



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #76  
Old 11-06-2009, 10:55 PM
Phil McAvity's Avatar
Phil McAvity Phil McAvity is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 993

Am I the only one who has noticed that Calgary and Edmonton are both building their tallest towers simultaneously?

And the race is on!

I'm not a betting man, but if I were.....



Last edited by Phil McAvity : 11-06-2009 at 11:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #77  
Old 11-07-2009, 02:24 AM
bulliver's Avatar
bulliver bulliver is offline
So very tired...
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 790

^ Bow had the headstart, but it is also much larger in scale, so I dunno...tie?

Here's an action sequence...







Reply With Quote
     
     
  #78  
Old 11-07-2009, 05:04 AM
sahlgoode's Avatar
sahlgoode sahlgoode is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 10

Great shots buddy. Got to wonder about your location when you took them.


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #79  
Old 11-07-2009, 05:08 AM
bulliver's Avatar
bulliver bulliver is offline
So very tired...
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 790

Thanks. The action sequence was shot with my tele...I was in the parking lot beside CN right in front.


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #80  
Old 11-14-2009, 06:02 PM
bulliver's Avatar
bulliver bulliver is offline
So very tired...
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 790

Thursday November 12..all pics by me from here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/44609493@N07/





Reply With Quote
     
     
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Projects & Construction > Highrise Construction
Forum Jump




Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:20 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Forums Directory