HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > SSP: Local Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted: Feb 11, 2010, 11:49 PM
dmuzika dmuzika is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 137
Deerfoot upkeep may return to city

Quote:
Deerfoot upkeep may return to city
By Jason Markusoff, Calgary HeraldFebruary 8, 2010

Ten years after the province took responsibility for Deerfoot Trail from the city, it is looking to return the urban freeway to Calgary's control.

Transportation Minister Luke Ouellette doesn't foresee the move until at least mid-decade, but his interest in a handover is catching Calgary aldermen by surprise.

Assuming control of Deerfoot Trail would leave the city dependent on provincial grants, or its own coffers, for safety upgrades and repaving the 50-kilometre ribbon.

Read more: http://www.calgaryherald.com/opinion...#ixzz0fH4A0Wx7
Bad idea IMO. A roadway of this magnatude should remain with the province.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted: Feb 11, 2010, 11:52 PM
YYCguys YYCguys is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,352
The City can barely maintain its own roads! What makes the province think that the City is up to the task of maintaining one more road, and not just any road!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted: Feb 12, 2010, 4:30 PM
lubicon's Avatar
lubicon lubicon is offline
Suburban dweller
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Calgary - our road planners are as bad as yours Edmonton
Posts: 3,201
Just in time to shovel the Glenmore/Deerfoot rebuild onto the City's shoulders. Nice move Ed. Especially after the Province has made so much noise over the years about the Canamex highway system and its importance to the province.
__________________
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe.

Albert Einstein
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted: Feb 12, 2010, 4:46 PM
Mazrim's Avatar
Mazrim Mazrim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 898
The article is pretty funny. Maybe the alderman are "surprised" to make the optics worse on the governments end because this idea is nothing new. It was new when the East Freeway report was finished, and that was how long ago?

How dare they force the city into something as terrible as this, a largely municiply-built highway completely in the middle of urban development, while the Alberta Goverment spends billions creating highways to offload traffic away from the road. The thought of it just drives me mad!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted: Feb 13, 2010, 10:39 PM
MalcolmTucker's Avatar
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Edmonchuck
Posts: 5,480
Wouldn't south deerfoot (south of 22x) still count as a bypass? Part of the reason the road was moved to the province was that the city didn't want to build that section.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted: Feb 16, 2010, 4:09 PM
Mazrim's Avatar
Mazrim Mazrim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 898
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir.Humphrey.Appleby View Post
Wouldn't south deerfoot (south of 22x) still count as a bypass? Part of the reason the road was moved to the province was that the city didn't want to build that section.
That portion from 22X to the junction near Okotoks will be maintained by the P3 contractor for SE Stoney Trail.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted: Feb 16, 2010, 9:47 PM
mersar's Avatar
mersar mersar is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 9,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mazrim View Post
That portion from 22X to the junction near Okotoks will be maintained by the P3 contractor for SE Stoney Trail.
Yep. So likely all the city would be given back is the area starting from just south of the Stoney Trail NE interchange to the north side of the 22X interchange.
__________________

Live or work in the Beltline? Check out the Official Beltline web site here
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > SSP: Local Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:18 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.