HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #41  
Old Posted: Dec 18, 2010, 5:11 AM
dragonsky dragonsky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Los Angeles Times

State adopts network of protected marine areas
The plan restricts or bans fishing along 15% of Southern California coast, including several areas backed by environmentalists, and leaves out some areas prized by recreational and commercial fishermen.
By Tony Barboza, Los Angeles Times
December 16, 2010
Reporting from Santa Barbara

More than 350 square miles of ocean from Point Conception to the U.S.-Mexico border — about 15% of the Southern California coast — will be protected under a network of marine reserves narrowly approved by state wildlife officials.

The 3-2 vote Wednesday by the California Fish and Game Commission bans or restricts fishing in 49 protected marine areas designed to replenish depleted fish populations and protect marine life.

The regulations come more than a decade after state legislators passed the California Marine Life Protection Act, which charged Fish and Game officials with establishing a statewide chain of sanctuaries.

Wednesday's vote was the final approval after two years of contentious negotiations between conservation groups pushing for strict curbs on fishing to preserve marine habitat and recreational anglers and commercial fishing groups wary of losing territory.

California has led the nation in establishing marine reserves, an idea conceived in response to steep population declines of rockfish, cod, lobster, abalone and other ocean dwellers despite catch limits and other fishing regulations.

Scientists who helped draft the plan argued that some species could disappear entirely without fishing bans in a diverse assortment of underwater canyons, kelp forests, sandy seafloors and rocky reefs.

Commissioner Richard B. Rogers voted in favor of the plan, saying it struck an "elegant balance" between conservation and fishing interests.

"The overarching goal is to return California to the sustainable abundance I observed growing up," the lifelong scuba diver said.

Commissioner Michael Sutton, founding director of the Center for the Future of the Oceans at the Monterey Bay Aquarium, called the protections "good news for everyone who cares about the future of our fisheries and the future of our marine ecosystems."

The state Department of Fish and Game is implementing the plan in segments, dividing the coastline into four areas, plus a fifth covering San Francisco Bay.

The five Southern California counties that make up the state's most populous stretch of coastline are the third region where the protected areas were established, following the central and north-central portions of the state.

The intense, year-round use of Southern California waters for recreational fishing and the relative scarcity of rocky reef habitat in the area meant that the key places conservationists zeroed in on to protect were the same spots anglers sought to keep for fishing.

In some instances, environmentalists got what they wanted, winning protections for a large kelp forest off Point Dume, Naples Reef in Santa Barbara County and a lengthy stretch of Laguna Beach coastline.

Fishing groups prevailed in keeping Rocky Point, a richly populated reef off Palos Verdes Peninsula, and most of the waters off La Jolla open to fishing.

The move to close some waters to fishing has been fiercely resisted by commercial and recreational fishing businesses based in harbors dotting the Southern California coastline, with some lobbyists denying that fish populations were excessively harvested or depleted.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has advocated for the implementation of marine protections before he leaves office.

Fish and Game Commission President Jim Kellogg, who voted against the marine protections, said the Schwarzenegger administration "tried to slam dunk this thing before they leave town."

Although the total size of the underwater reserves fell short of scientists recommendation to protect at least 20% of near-shore waters, conservationists said the strong protections adopted in some areas could preserve marine habitat for future generations.

The protections are likely to take effect sometime in 2011, with about 12% of near-shore waters designated as State Marine Reserves and "no-take" areas that are off-limits to fishing, and 3% designated as State Marine Conservation Areas that allow limited commercial and recreational fishing.

Game wardens will be charged with enforcing the fishing restrictions. Researchers will monitor the reserves' effectiveness in boosting fish populations.
Read More: http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la...,1895962.story
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #42  
Old Posted: May 7, 2011, 12:12 PM
202_Cyclist's Avatar
202_Cyclist 202_Cyclist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,352
Man-made rock reef brings a welcome seaweed change (LA Times)


Man-made rock reef brings a welcome seaweed change


Three years ago, Southern California Edison pushed basketball-size rocks from a barge off San Clemente. Little did the utility realize that the kelp reef it created would thrive the way it has, or as quickly.

By Tony Barboza
Los Angeles Times
May 7, 2011

"It was a gamble when Southern California Edison crews pushed basketball-size chunks of rock from a barge off San Clemente three years ago.

Eventually, the utility company hoped, the artificial reef it had assembled 50 feet below the waves would support a new kelp forest and fulfill state-imposed requirements to offset the damage its nearby nuclear power plant causes to marine life.

But no one expected the 174-acre Wheeler North Reef would thrive the way it has. Or as quickly..."

http://www.latimes.com/news/science/...=Google+Reader
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43  
Old Posted: Sep 28, 2011, 2:04 PM
dragonsky dragonsky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,268
WHO | World Health Organization
Public Health and Environment (PHE)
Database: outdoor air pollution in cities
http://www.who.int/phe/health_topics.../en/index.html

LA seems okay as compared to Europe such as Paris.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #44  
Old Posted: Jan 25, 2012, 2:55 PM
dragonsky dragonsky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Los Angeles Times



California OKs $6.5 million to plan Ballona Wetlands restoration
Conservationists are at odds over how drastically to alter the existing landscape of the degraded marshland, one of the few remaining in Southern California.
By Tony Barboza, Los Angeles Times
January 21, 2012

In a first step toward restoring one of Southern California's few remaining wetlands and opening it to the public, the state has approved spending $6.5 million for planning a massive restoration of the degraded Ballona Wetlands — but conservationists are at odds over what that means for the future of the site.

Though construction is still years away, the question of how drastically to alter the existing landscape in order to revive the remaining 600 acres of the Ballona Wetlands is polarizing conservationists who fought for three decades to protect the site from the sort of development that ate up most of it.

"It's going to be a delicate balancing act," said Lisa Fimiani, executive director of Friends of Ballona Wetlands and a cautious supporter of restoration. "It's going to be: What habitat do you want to bring back and at what cost? Because some of it will be altered."

PHOTOS: A visit to Ballona Wetlands

Restoring the site will require some large-scale changes, said restoration supporters like Shelley Luce, executive director of the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Commission, a state organization whose nonprofit foundation will use some of the money to collect scientific data and conduct environmental reviews.

Initial proposals call for spending $100 million to remove concrete levees and truck out tons of sediment dumped on the property, allowing water from Ballona Creek and the sea to flow into the wetlands. Bike paths would be built atop earthern flood-control berms on the reserve's perimeter and public boardwalks would allow visitors access to the site without disturbing plants, birds and other wildlife.

"We have the potential at Ballona to restore this degraded and damaged habitat and return it to a beautiful, sustainable natural refuge for people and wildlife," Luce said.

The vast coastal wetlands once spanned 2,000 acres at the mouth of Ballona Creek, covering much of what is now Marina del Rey, Playa del Rey and Venice. Only a quarter remains today, much of it a dry, fenced-off expanse of brush that is littered with garbage in places, surrounded by high-rises and subdivisions and criss-crossed by congested boulevards.

Developers and environmental activists wrangled over the site for decades before the state agreed in 2003 to spend $139 million to acquire it as an ecological reserve. Still, state officials and a number of environmental groups say it is far from a healthy, functioning ecosystem.

The soil was raised high above sea level with the sediment scooped out decades ago when Marina del Rey was built. Though the open space supports wildlife, much of the habitat is degraded and ocean waters must again reach deep into the marshlands if plants and animals are to thrive again, restoration proponents say.

Critics say the reserve is not as degraded as portrayed by restoration proponents. Some local environmentalists oppose the project, which they say would disrupt rare birds and flowers that already live there.

"We are opposed to industrial-scale habitat conversion, including bulldozing that destroys current ecosystems," Kathy Knight, conservation chair of the Sierra Club Airport Marina Group, told members of the the Coastal Conservancy, which approved funding for the studies on Thursday.

Instead of a grand reshaping of the site, Knight and other critics said, funds would be put to better use on more delicate improvements, such as using volunteers and schoolchildren to plant native vegetation or buying up surrounding property to use as a buffer zone.

For now, the bulk of the reserve remains off-limits to the public except through guided tours or by special permission.

On a tour of the wetlands Thursday, two dozen state government officials had to be escorted by a ranger into one area near Marina del Rey, ducking below bushes and squeezing through an opening in a chain-link fence.

On the other side stretched a field of vegetation, its silty soil pocked with gopher holes and marred with pieces of discarded clothes and trash. A narrow, steep-banked channel known as the Fiji Ditch, an official for the Conservancy noted, is the only vein of ocean water that still penetrates the wetlands.
Read More: http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la...,2930790.story
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:53 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.