HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development

    

Old Post Office Redevelopment Tower [1] in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Chicago Skyscraper Diagram
Chicago Projects & Construction Forum
            
View Full Map

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #141  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2011, 7:09 PM
emathias's Avatar
emathias emathias is online now
Adoptive Chicagoan
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: River North, Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 3,071
Quote:
Originally Posted by lawfin View Post
Who the hell is Kennan Earl?
He's an LA real estate agent on HGTV's "Selling LA" show.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #142  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2011, 2:19 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
El Barto
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: California/Argentina
Posts: 2,010
according to SSC this is an actual proposal not just a vision, maybe it won't get built to 2000 feet but im under the impression some sort of massive tower could be put here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #143  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2011, 3:20 PM
bnk's Avatar
bnk bnk is online now
પટેલ. કે ન
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: chicagoland
Posts: 8,022
Nope sorry you were duped but nothing will ever be built there. At least nothing resembling this project. Nothing will be done to the PO and no tall buildings will be built.
__________________
facebook
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #144  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2011, 3:31 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
El Barto
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: California/Argentina
Posts: 2,010
Why? The development would be good for the city I feel.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #145  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2011, 8:21 PM
Roadcruiser1's Avatar
Roadcruiser1 Roadcruiser1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,084
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatan View Post
Why? The development would be good for the city I feel.
It's owned by a person that is notorious for selling land and not developing it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #146  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2011, 4:09 AM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
El Barto
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: California/Argentina
Posts: 2,010
But whoever buys it will most certainly develop something there right? Such a huge piece of land to go to waste.

Oh well, I hope Chi town pulls off another supertall or two here eventually, that would be amazing!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #147  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2011, 7:09 AM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
El Barto
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: California/Argentina
Posts: 2,010
Hopefully someone can build something there eventually though, as the site has air rights to 2000'

(if I'm not mistaken)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #148  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2011, 1:35 AM
untitledreality untitledreality is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 834
Quote:
Originally Posted by THE BIG APPLE View Post
I don't know maybe it's deja vu all over again but I don't feel like this will get built. Chicago is also notorious for not getting the job done (most of the time). Spire, South Dearborn, Waldorf Astoria, Chi WTC, etc.
Its not going to get built because it was never a real project. Just a notorious speculator trying to flip a property.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #149  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2012, 10:28 AM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
El Barto
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: California/Argentina
Posts: 2,010
^SSC lists it as a serious project, but they're data isn't always correct.

It did say the project wouldn't go under way for 5 to 10 years, which means something could maybe happen. Isn't the city of Chicago still trying to approve this?

Last edited by Zapatan; Jan 4, 2012 at 8:40 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #150  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2012, 7:52 PM
untitledreality untitledreality is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 834
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatan View Post
which means something could maybe happen.
Sure, something "could" happen. Just like how pigs "could" fly if only they had wings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #151  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2012, 8:47 AM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
El Barto
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: California/Argentina
Posts: 2,010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13FnuKo9b8Q


So somewhere down the road there's a possibility for this site to be redeveloped into skyscrapers somehow it seems.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #152  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2012, 8:50 PM
stormkingfan stormkingfan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: PhilaPA
Posts: 422
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onn View Post
I think the view from the northeast is best. It gives a better perspective of the scaling. The other views suggest that many other high-rises should be built south and west of this complex if built.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #153  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2012, 1:41 AM
ChiSoxRox's Avatar
ChiSoxRox ChiSoxRox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,450
I know this project is a pipe dream, but having a tower looming over the Sears would be an amazing sight.
__________________
Like the pre-war masonry skyscrapers? Then check out my list of the tallest buildings in 1950.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #154  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2012, 2:48 AM
THE BIG APPLE's Avatar
THE BIG APPLE THE BIG APPLE is offline
Khurram Parvaz
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 2,035
Chicago Tribune

Fire erupts on roof of old Post Office

Quote:
Staff report

8:46 p.m. CST, February 17, 2012

A fire erupted tonight on the roof and a portion of the 10th floor of the old U.S. Post Officein the West Loop Gate neighborhood.

The fire started on the roof of the building, 433 W. Van Buren St., according to the Chicago Fire Department.

Fire Media Affairs Director Larry Langford said they also have fire on the 10th floor of the building, considered a high-rise.

No injuries have been reported as of 7:05 p.m. and crews continued to fight the blazes, Langford said.

About 6:30 p.m., a still and box alarm and an EMS Plan I, which automatically sends five ambulances to the scene, were called for the blaze, according to Langford.

As of about 7:30 p.m. firefighters hoisted by a large crane could be seen using portable lights to look into windows on the upper floors of the east side of the building.

The alarm was struck out and EMS Plan secured a little before 8 p.m., while cleanup and overhaul continued.

Police News Affairs Officer Veejay Zala said police also have not received any reports of injuries.

The 300 to 600 blocks of South Canal Street, the 300 to 600 blocks of West Van Buren Street, and the 200 to 500 blocks of West Harrison Street were closed while the fire was fought, according to a Central District police sergeant.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #155  
Old Posted Feb 23, 2012, 5:59 AM
ChiPhi's Avatar
ChiPhi ChiPhi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Chicago, Philadelphia
Posts: 500
looks like Davies is running into some more carrying costs...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #156  
Old Posted May 19, 2012, 7:46 AM
N90 N90 is offline
Voice of the Modern World
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 397
I am of course a huge fan of Chicago and I sometimes open this thread to see whats going on but with the amount of posts in here (over 7,000!) its hard to keep up. So I don't know if anyone's posted this yet or not but I was hoping to ask for more information on this 120 story tower that seems to be making its way into Chicago's skyline in the future.


http://blog.chicagoarchitecture.info...daylight-time/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #157  
Old Posted May 19, 2012, 10:40 AM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is offline
My Mind Has Left My Body
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,557
Quote:
Originally Posted by N90 View Post
I am of course a huge fan of Chicago and I sometimes open this thread to see whats going on but with the amount of posts in here (over 7,000!) its hard to keep up. So I don't know if anyone's posted this yet or not but I was hoping to ask for more information on this 120 story tower that seems to be making its way into Chicago's skyline in the future.
[url]
Looky here

http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=192697
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #158  
Old Posted May 25, 2012, 5:27 PM
XIII XIII is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 67
Vision Video for old post office redevelopment.
It looks like they've modified the tower designs:
http://vimeo.com/42700645
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #159  
Old Posted May 25, 2012, 6:17 PM
BraveNewWorld's Avatar
BraveNewWorld BraveNewWorld is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 316
Quote:
Originally Posted by XIII View Post
Vision Video for old post office redevelopment.
It looks like they've modified the tower designs:
http://vimeo.com/42700645
That looks awesome, I am surprised to see this move forward. When will we know whether it was approved ?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #160  
Old Posted May 25, 2012, 6:31 PM
lawfin lawfin is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,844
Quote:
Originally Posted by BraveNewWorld View Post
That looks awesome, I am surprised to see this move forward. When will we know whether it was approved ?
Approved? Come on seriously. This is little more than modern media puffery. It ain't going to happen ok.

6.2 million sq feet of entertainment space
4.1 million sq feet of hotel some 7500 rooms

3.8 million sq feet of residential

Those numbers are massive. In perspective when the WTC complex was destroyed if I recall that was in total some 12 million sq feet of space this is planned at 2 million larger than that if you believe it you are a fool.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:23 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.